Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Paramount Station, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Rafael Arroyo, Jr.
Defendant: Does 1-10 and Paramount Station, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv02908
Filed: April 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S Gutierrez
Referring Judge: Frederick F Mumm
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2019 Filing 12 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Paramount Station, Inc. a California Corporation. (lom)
June 1, 2019 Filing 11 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Paramount Station, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service) (Grace, Phyl)
May 11, 2019 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., upon Defendant Paramount Station, Inc. served on 5/9/2019, answer due 5/30/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: HAMID ZEREHI in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
April 25, 2019 Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation Early Mediation Program. (jre)
April 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
April 16, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Paramount Station, Inc. (esa)
April 16, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
April 16, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (esa)
April 15, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Handy, Russell)
April 15, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., (Handy, Russell)
April 15, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Handy, Russell)
April 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23555053 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Rafael Arroyo, Jr.(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Paramount Station, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paramount Station, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rafael Arroyo, Jr.
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Phyl Grace
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?