Oliver Coleman v. County of Los Angeles
| Oliver Coleman |
| Does 1-10 and County of Los Angeles |
| 2:2019cv02959 |
| April 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 2 filed. Parties request to appear before a neutral selected from the court's Mediation Panel for mediation. Filed by Plaintiff Oliver Coleman(Shapiro, Lara) |
Filing 14
(IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING NOTICE: COUNSEL OF RECORD ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that on the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference set for July 1, 2019, is TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. No appearance by counsel will be necessary. The Court will issue such further order as deemed appropriate. By Chief Judge Virginia A. Phillips THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (bh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 13 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 3. Parties request for private mediation. Filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles(Kalderon, Eden) |
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3 days, filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kalderon, Eden) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Scheduling Conference set for 7/1/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh)
|
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Justin W Clark counsel for Defendant County of Los Angeles. Adding Eden Kaleron as counsel of record for County of Los Angeles for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Clark, Justin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles, (Clark, Justin) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Amended Complaint REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Clark, Justin) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (vv)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Los Angeles County, Does 1 to 10. Filed by Plaintiff Oliver Coleman. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/14/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL] (lh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants County of Los Angeles, Does 1-10 amending Complaint; JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiff Oliver Coleman. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL](lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant The County of Los Angeles. (Clark, Justin) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The County of Los Angeles, identifying Defendant The County of Los Angeles and Plaintiff Oliver Coleman. (Clark, Justin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The County of Los Angeles. (Clark, Justin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number BC717909 Receipt No: 0973-23565961 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant The County of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Justin W Clark added to party The County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Clark, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
