Regina Fergins v. Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff: Regina Fergins
Defendant: Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv02985
Filed: April 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael W Fitzgerald
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. In light of the Notice of Settlement #10 filed May 28, 2019, the Court sets a hearing on Order To Show Cause Re Dismissal for July 29, 2019 at 11:30 a.m. If a stipulated dismissal is filed prior to this date, the matter will be taken off calendar and no appearance is needed. All other hearings and deadlines are hereby vacated. (iv)
May 28, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement Regina Fergins. (Kent, Trinette)
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In response to this Order to Show Cause, the Court will accept the following no later than June 3, 2019. BY DEFENDANT: RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT (Response) OR BY PLAINTIFF: DEFAULT APPLICATION for Defendant who has not timely responded to the Complaint. See document for details. (lom)
May 3, 2019 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Regina Fergins, upon Defendant Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC served on 5/1/2019, answer due 5/22/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Zach Rokesz, Process Specialist in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kent, Trinette)
April 19, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC. (car)
April 19, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
April 19, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car)
April 18, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Regina Fergins. (Kent, Trinette)
April 18, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Regina Fergins, (Kent, Trinette)
April 18, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Regina Fergins. (Kent, Trinette)
April 18, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23571339 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Regina Fergins. (Attorney Trinette Gragirena Kent added to party Regina Fergins(pty:pla))(Kent, Trinette)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Regina Fergins v. Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regina Fergins
Represented By: Trinette Gragirena Kent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?