Regina Fergins v. Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC
Regina Fergins |
Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC |
2:2019cv02985 |
April 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Steve Kim |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. In light of the Notice of Settlement #10 filed May 28, 2019, the Court sets a hearing on Order To Show Cause Re Dismissal for July 29, 2019 at 11:30 a.m. If a stipulated dismissal is filed prior to this date, the matter will be taken off calendar and no appearance is needed. All other hearings and deadlines are hereby vacated. (iv) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement Regina Fergins. (Kent, Trinette) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In response to this Order to Show Cause, the Court will accept the following no later than June 3, 2019. BY DEFENDANT: RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT (Response) OR BY PLAINTIFF: DEFAULT APPLICATION for Defendant who has not timely responded to the Complaint. See document for details. (lom) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Regina Fergins, upon Defendant Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC served on 5/1/2019, answer due 5/22/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Zach Rokesz, Process Specialist in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kent, Trinette) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Regina Fergins. (Kent, Trinette) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Regina Fergins, (Kent, Trinette) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Regina Fergins. (Kent, Trinette) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23571339 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Regina Fergins. (Attorney Trinette Gragirena Kent added to party Regina Fergins(pty:pla))(Kent, Trinette) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Regina Fergins v. Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Regina Fergins | |
Represented By: | Trinette Gragirena Kent |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.