Sherri Vandoli v. Brenntag North America, Inc. et al
Sherri Vandoli |
Chattem, Inc., Whittaker Clark and Daniels, Inc., Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Imerys Talc America, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Revlon, Inc., Brenntag Specialties, Inc., Does 1-500, Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc., Brenntag North America, Inc., Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. and Cyprus Amax Minerals Company sued individually, doing business as, and as successor to American Talc Company, Metropolitan Talc Co. Inc. and Chrles Mathieu Inc. and Sierra Talc Company and United Talc Company |
2:2019cv03076 |
April 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 Receipt of Acknowledgment of remand documents by Superior Court of California Los Angeles County, case no JCCP 4872. (lom) |
Filing 19 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Los Angeles, CA 90012. (bm) |
Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The OSC Talc Actions are hereby REMANDED to state court. Any motions or ex parte applications to remand that are pending in the OSC Talc Actions are DENIED AS MOOT, and the hearings vacated. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (rrey) |
Filing 17 JOINDER filed by Plaintiff Sherri Vandoli (Cucu, Rebecca) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Defendants Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc.to Order to Show Cause,, #14 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Julia E. Romano, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H Part 1, #10 Exhibit H Part 2, #11 Exhibit H Part 3, #12 Exhibit H Part 4, #13 Exhibit I Part 1, #14 Exhibit I Part 2, #15 Exhibit I Part 3, #16 Exhibit I Part 4, #17 Exhibit I Part 5, #18 Exhibit J, #19 Exhibit K Part 1, #20 Exhibit K Part 2, #21 Exhibit L, #22 Exhibit M)(Romano, Julia) |
Filing 14 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY REMAINING CENTRAL DISTRICT TALC ACTIONS SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court hereby ORDERS Johnson & Johnson to show cause why the remaining Central District Talc Actions should not be remanded. Johnson & Johnson shall respond in writing by Monday, May 13, 2019. The plaintiffs in these actions shall file a response, if any, by the following Monday, May 20, 2019. The Court will then take the matter under submission and issue a ruling no later than Monday, June 3, 2019. (rrey) |
Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Statement #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Case number reads CV 19-03076-ODW-SK, but should read CV 19-03076-CJC-JC. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
Filing 13 STATEMENT Pursuant to Rule 9027(e)(3) filed by Plaintiff Sherri Vandoli (Cucu, Rebecca) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Movant Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc., served on April 22, 2019. (Romano, Julia) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Movant Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc., served on April 23, 2019. (Romano, Julia) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings [L.R. 83-1.4] and Request for Stay of Proceedings filed by Movant Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Romano, Julia) |
Filing 9 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:19-cv-03036 CJC(JCx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Steve Kim and Judge Otis D. Wright, II to Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-03076 CJC(JCx). Signed by Judge Cormac J. Carney (rn) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION; PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 7 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 7/8/19 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Brenntag North America, Inc., Brenntag Specialties, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Chattem, Inc., Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Does 1-500, Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc., Revlon, Inc., Whittaker Clark and Daniels, Inc., Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Sherri Vandoli. Filed in State Court on 5/22/2018 Submitted with Exhibit A Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants Johnson and Johnson. Submitted with Exhibit B attachment 2 to notice of removal #1 .(Attorney Susan Victoria Vargas added to party Johnson and Johnson(pty:dft), Attorney Susan Victoria Vargas added to party Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc.(pty:dft))(car) Modified on 4/23/2019 (car). Modified on 4/23/2019 (car). |
NON-CONFORMED COPY ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Defendant Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc. Submitted with Exhibit B Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 .(car) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Movant Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., (Romano, Julia) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Movants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (Romano, Julia) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Romano, Julia) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior, case number BC706921 Receipt No: 0973-23585123 - Fee: $400, filed by Movant Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C Part 1, #4 Exhibit C Part 2, #5 Exhibit C Part 3, #6 Exhibit C Part 4, #7 Exhibit C Part 5, #8 Exhibit C Part 6, #9 Exhibit D) (Attorney Julia Elizabeth Romano added to party Johnson & Johnson(pty:bkmov), Attorney Julia Elizabeth Romano added to party Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Romano, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.