Elia Haggar et al v. Victorias Secret Stores, LLC et al
| Kyo Hak Chu, Valerie Brooks and Elia Haggar |
| Does 1 to 10, inclusive and Victorias Secret Stores, LLC |
| 2:2019cv03116 |
| April 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiffs Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu, Elia Haggar. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Victorias Secret Stores, LLC answer now due 6/21/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Victorias Secret Stores, LLC.(Attorney Alexandrea H Young added to party Victorias Secret Stores, LLC(pty:dft))(Young, Alexandrea) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE to Parties Re (ADR-20) ADA Disability Access Litigation/Application for Stay and Early Mediation: PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED to serve the ADA Packet on Defendant(s) at the same time the summons and complaint are served, if possible. If, upon receipt of this Notice to Parties, Plaintiff has already served Defendant(s), Plaintiff must serve the ADA Packet no later than fourteen (14) days after this Notice to Parties is filed by the Court. Within three (3) days of serving Defendant(s), Plaintiff must file with the Court a proof of service indicating that the ADA Packet was served on Defendant(s). *See Notice for further details.* (smom) |
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-03116 MWF(MRWx). (rn)
|
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Elia Haggar, Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu, upon Defendant Victorias Secret Stores, LLC served on 5/2/2019, answer due 5/23/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daisy Montengro, Person Authorized to Accept service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Victorias Secret Stores, LLC. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu, Elia Haggar. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu, Elia Haggar. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu, Elia Haggar, (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23593042 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Elia Haggar, Valerie Brooks, Kyo Hak Chu. (Attorney Thiago Merlini Coelho added to party Valerie Brooks(pty:pla), Attorney Thiago Merlini Coelho added to party Kyo Hak Chu(pty:pla), Attorney Thiago Merlini Coelho added to party Elia Haggar(pty:pla))(Coelho, Thiago) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
