Susan Laws v. ADP, LLC et al
| Susan Laws |
| ADP, LLC, Does 1 through 10, Inclusive and ADP, LLC doing business as A D Processing, LLC Erroneously Sued As Automatic Data Processing, Inc., a Delaware Corporation |
| 2:2019cv03158 |
| April 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Stipulation Regarding Selection of Panel Mediator filed by Defendant ADP, LLC (Shavit, Sherry) |
Filing 12
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson re Stipulation for Protective Order #11 . (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant ADP, LLC.(Shavit, Sherry) |
|
Filing 10
CIVIL TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 9 MINUTES OF NEW CASE STATUS CONFERENCE held before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The Court sets the following dates: Bench Trial set for 9/24/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Pretrial Conference set for 9/23/2019 at 03:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The parties request to participate in mediation is granted, and are referred to the Court's ADR Program. Court Reporter: Sheri Kleeger. (mrgo) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 5/20/2019 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 7
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Karen L. Stevenson. New Case Number 2:19-cv-03158-SVW (KSx). (et) |
| CONFORMED ELECTRONICALLY FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants ADP, LLC, Does 1 through 10, Inclusive, filed by Plaintiff Susan Laws. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/25/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 1 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
| CONFORMED ELECTRONICALLY FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT filed by Defendant ADP, LLC, doing business in California as A D Processing (erroneously sued as Automatic Data Processing, Inc.) [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/18/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 2 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 .(et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Automatic Data Processing, Inc., identifying 1) Plaintiff Susan Laws; 2) Arthur Handel; 3) ADP, LLC; 4) ADP Atlantic, LLC; 5) Automatic Data Processing, Inc.; 6) Tharpe & Howell, LLP. (Shavit, Sherry) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Shavit, Sherry) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 19LBCV00126 Receipt No: 0973-23581290 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Declaration of Helena Almeida, #4 Proof of Service) (Attorney Sherry B Shavit added to party Automatic Data Processing, Inc.(pty:dft))(Shavit, Sherry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
