Chang Eui Bong v. York Square Liquor, Inc. et al
Chang Eui Bong |
York Square Liquor, Inc., York Square LLC and Does 1 to 10 inclusive |
2:2019cv03201 |
April 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Steve Kim |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (mrgo) |
Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants York Square LLC, York Square Liquor, Inc. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chang Eui Bong, (Hong, Kevin) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chang Eui Bong. (Hong, Kevin) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Chang Eui Bong. (Hong, Kevin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23603374 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Chang Eui Bong. (Attorney Kevin Hyunjong Hong added to party Chang Eui Bong(pty:pla))(Hong, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.