Hyun Kim v. Quick Frame, Inc. et al
| Hyun Kim |
| Quick Frame, Inc., Does 1 to 10 inclusive and Austin Family Development LLC |
| 2:2019cv03327 |
| April 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (wm) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Austin Family Development LLC, Quick Frame, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hyun Kim, (Hong, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hyun Kim. (Hong, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Hyun Kim. (Hong, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23616609 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Hyun Kim. (Attorney Kevin Hyunjong Hong added to party Hyun Kim(pty:pla))(Hong, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
