Gloria Cervantes et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al
Gloria Cervantes, Guadalupe Barron, Barbara Miranda, Juliana Medina, Sheiron Allen Barasa, Carolyn Pouliot, JCCP Plaintiffs, Marilu Haworth and Arlene Hoffman |
Johnson and Johnson, Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. |
2:2019cv03343 |
April 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Frederick F Mumm |
Fernando M Olguin |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. JCCP 4872, acknowledged on 5/6/2019. (iv) |
Filing 8 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court. (iv) |
Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: REMAND by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The above- captioned action shall be remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012, pursuant to 28U.S.C. 1452(b). All pending motions are denied as moot. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (iv) |
Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc., re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on April 26, 2019. (Toole, Caroline) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Carolyn Pouliot, Guadalupe Barron, Barbara Miranda, Marilu Haworth, Arlene Hoffman, Gloria Cervantes, Juliana Medina, JCCP Plaintiffs, Sheiron Allen Barasa. Filed in County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC620876, 5?18/2016, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (ghap) |
COPY OF SECOND AMENDED MASTER COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Los Angeles Superior Court Case JCCP No. 4872, filed by JCCP Plaintiffs (submitted as document 1, attachment 3)(Attorney Mark P Robinson, Jr added to party JCCP Plaintiffs(pty:pla)(ghap) Modified on 4/27/2019 (ghap). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., (Villalobos, Amanda) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.. (Villalobos, Amanda) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number JCCP 4872 Receipt No: 0973-23619185 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amanda Villalobos, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D Part 1, #6 Exhibit D Part 2) (Attorney Amanda Villalobos added to party Johnson & Johnson(pty:dft), Attorney Amanda Villalobos added to party Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.(pty:dft))(Villalobos, Amanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.