Lakishia Howard v. Johnson and Johnson et al
| Lakishia Howard and JCCP Plaintiffs |
| Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc, Johnson & Johnson, DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive,, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc, Johnson and Johnson, Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Luzenac America, Inc. and Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies Inc |
| 2:2019cv03463 |
| April 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court. (jp) |
| Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court for the State of California. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court for the State of California. (lom) |
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. For all of the foregoing reasons, the equities favor remanding this action. The action is hereby remanded to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. JCCP4872. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lom) Modified on 5/3/2019 (lom). (mailed 1st Street)
|
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Melanie Meneses Palmer counsel for Plaintiff Lakishia Howard. Helen E. Zukin is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Lakishia Howard. (Palmer, Melanie) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
| COPY OF SECOND AMENDED MASTER COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc, Demand for Jury Trial, Los Angeles Superior Court Case JCCP No. 4872, filed by JCCP Plaintiffs (submitted as document 1, attachment 3)(Attorney Mark P Robinson, Jr added to party JCCP Plaintiffs(pty:pla)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Lakishia Howard. (Filed in County of Santa Clara, Case No. 17CV318663, 11/6/17, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc, (Janizeh, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc. (Janizeh, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number JCCP 4872 Receipt No: 0973-23629571 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc, Johnson & Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amanda Villalobos, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D-Part 1, #6 Exhibit D-Part 2) (Attorney Nicholas Vaughan Janizeh added to party Johnson & Johnson(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas Vaughan Janizeh added to party Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc(pty:dft))(Janizeh, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
