Jennifer Arstill, et al v. Conopco, Inc., et al
Brock Arstill and Jennifer Arstill |
Conopco, Inc., Lamden Property Management, Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., Cyprus Mines Corporation, Does 1-500, Parfums De Couer, Ltd., Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc., Lamden Family Trust and Johnson and Johnson |
Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. |
2:2019cv03538 |
April 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Gail J Standish |
P.I. : Asbestos |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 19STCV09118, acknowledged on 5/9/2019. (gk) |
Filing 10 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (kti) |
Filing 9 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee remanding case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case number 19STCV09118. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6) (kti) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Movant Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice (Other) #5 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 served on April 30, 2019. (Foster, Stacy) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (esa) |
COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, Jury Demand, filed by defendants Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 2)(esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Conopco, Inc., Cyprus Mines Corporation, Does 1-500, Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc., Lamden Family Trust, Lamden Property Management, Inc., Parfums De Couer, Ltd., Jury Demand, filed by plaintiffs Jennifer Arstill, Brock Arstill. (Filed in state court 3/15/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE Notice of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings [L.R. 83-1.4] and Request for Stay of Proceedings filed by Movant Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc.. (Foster, Stacy) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Movants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. identifying Movant as Corporate Parent. (Foster, Stacy) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Movant Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., (Foster, Stacy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc.. (Foster, Stacy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV09118 Receipt No: 0973-23637485 - Fee: $400, filed by Movant Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C Part 1, #4 Exhibit C Part 2, #5 Exhibit C Part 3, #6 Exhibit C Part 4, #7 Exhibit C Part 5, #8 Exhibit C Part 6, #9 Exhibit D) (Attorney Stacy Lynn Foster added to party Johnson & Johnson(pty:bkmov), Attorney Stacy Lynn Foster added to party Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Foster, Stacy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.