Mary Elizabeth Clevenger v. Nancy A. Berryhill
| Mary Elizabeth Clevenger |
| Acting Commissioner Nancy A Berryhill |
| 2:2019cv03723 |
| May 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 2:19-cv-03723 KS on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #11 , Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #12 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rn) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A Berryhill. (Attorney Timothy R Bolin added to party Nancy A Berryhill(pty:dft))(Bolin, Timothy) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Mary Elizabeth Clevenger. (McCabe, Patricia) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mary Elizabeth Clevenger, upon Defendant Nancy A Berryhill served on 5/20/2019, answer due 7/19/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Flavia Dela Rosa. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service on Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner Social Security, #2 Proof of Service on the Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration, #3 Proof of Service on USDOJ)(McCabe, Patricia) |
Filing 9
ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A Berryhill. (hr) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson: granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mary Elizabeth Clevenger. (McCabe, Patricia) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mary Elizabeth Clevenger, identifying Social Security Administration. (McCabe, Patricia) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mary Elizabeth Clevenger. (McCabe, Patricia) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Mary Elizabeth Clevenger. (McCabe, Patricia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Mary Elizabeth Clevenger. (Attorney Patricia L McCabe added to party Mary Elizabeth Clevenger(pty:pla))(McCabe, Patricia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
