Helen Medina et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
| HELEN MEDINA and ALBERT MARTINEZ |
| NURSE ISAAC, NURSE UY, Deputy Hernandez, ALEX VILLANUEVA, NURSE MACABUHAY, NURSE HALANES, BLITHE TOLENTINO, PAUL GLINIECKI, County of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv03808 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets the following: Discovery cut-off 12/20/2019. Motions due by 2/20/2020. Last date to conduct mediation is 1/22/2020. Post-Mediation Status Conference set for 1/23/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. Pretrial Conference set for 3/19/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. Jury Trial set for 3/31/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge George H. Wu. Court Reporter: Katie E. Thibodeaux. (mrgo) |
Filing 23
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER by Judge George H. Wu. On June 6, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint. In light of that filing, the Operative Complaint is no longer the original complaint. As such, the Court VACATES Defendant County of Los Angeles's Motion to Dismiss Complaint by the County of Los Angeles #20 , filed on May 23, 2019, and set for hearing on June 27, 2019. (lom)
|
| Filing 22 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4-6 Days, filed by Plaintiffs Albert Martinez, Helen Medina.. (Conlogue, Kevin) |
| Filing 21 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiffs Albert Martinez, Helen Medina(Conlogue, Kevin) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. Motion set for hearing on 6/27/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attachments: #1 Declaration by Chandler A. Parker, Esq. re: Compliance with Local Rule 7-3, #2 Exhibit (1) - Request For Conference of Counsel, #3 Exhibit (2) Response by Plaintiffs' Counsel) (Parker, Chandler) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT by Judge George H. Wu re: #16 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File. Defendants must file a response to Plaintiffs' Complaint by May 23, 2019. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 18
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. (Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/10/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 6/24/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 17
Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 16 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (Attorney Jack Frank Altura added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft)) (Altura, Jack) |
| Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), as to defendant Hernandez. (mrgo) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), as to defendant Isaac. (mrgo) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), as to defendant Macabuhay. (mrgo) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), as to defendant Uy. (mrgo) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), as to defendant Halanes. (mrgo) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), as to defendant Blithe Tolentino. (mrgo) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), as to defendant Alex Villanueva. (mrgo) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), as to defendant Paul Gliniecki. (mrgo) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Helen Medina. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement, #3 Supplement, #4 Supplement, #5 Supplement, #6 Supplement, #7 Supplement)(Conlogue, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants County of Los Angeles, Does, Paul Gliniecki, Halanes, Hernandez, Isaac, Macabuhay, Blithe Tolentino, Uy, Alex Villanueva, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiffs Albert Martinez, Helen Medina. (Filed in state court 3/22/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles, Re: NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL OF STATE ACTION served on May 2, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice to Adverse Party of Removal Of State Action)(Parker, Chandler) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles, (Parker, Chandler) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Parker, Chandler) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV10101 Receipt No: 0973-23665858 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (1) - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit (2) - Proof of Service of Summons, #3 Exhibit (3) - Civil Case Summary) (Attorney Chandler Adrian Parker added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Parker, Chandler) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
