Eric Love v. Johnson and Johnson et al
Eric Love and JCCP Plaintiffs |
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc. f/k/a Luzenac America, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. f/k/a Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson and Johnson, Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc. and Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. |
2:2019cv03854 |
May 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Steve Kim |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Receipt of Order of Remand filed. (mrgo) |
Filing 10 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (mrgo) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson remanding case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case number JCCP4872. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (See document for details) (mrgo) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc., re Notice of Related Case(s) #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice (Other) #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 5-3-19. (Healy, Michael) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) |
COPY OF SECOND AMENDED MASTER COMPLAINT against Defendants Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc., Does 1 through 100, inclusive, JURY DEMAND, filed by JCCP Plaintiffs. (RECEIVED IN LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO.: JCCP 4872 ON 1/15/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B AS ATTACHMENT NO. 3 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
COMPLAINT COPY OF ENDROSE COMPLAINT against Defendants Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson and Johnson, Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc., Does 1 through 100, inclusive. Jury Demand, filed by Plaintiff Eric Love. [FILED IN NAPA COUNTY OF SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NUMBER: 17CV001192 ON 10/18/2017 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Weissenberger, Emily) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. Related Case(s): See Ex. A (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Weissenberger, Emily) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., (Weissenberger, Emily) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.. (Weissenberger, Emily) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior, case number JCCP 4872 Receipt No: 0973-23669033 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Emily Weissenberger, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (Attorney Emily M Weissenberger added to party Johnson & Johnson(pty:dft), Attorney Emily M Weissenberger added to party Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.(pty:dft))(Weissenberger, Emily) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.