Quantum Behavioral Solutions, Inc. v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC et al
Quantum Behavioral Solutions, Inc. |
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
2:2019cv03935 |
May 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
Dale S Fischer |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Theodore Dorenkamp, III counsel for Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. Adding Theodore Dorenkamp III as counsel of record for Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Attorney Theodore Dorenkamp, III added to party Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC(pty:dft))(Dorenkamp, Theodore) |
Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lindsay G Carlson counsel for Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. Lindsay G. Carlson is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Carlson, Lindsay) |
Filing 7 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 9/23/2019 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. Filed in State Court on 5/3/2019 Submitted with attachment 2 to notice of removal #1 (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Quantum Behavioral Solutions, Inc., filed by plaintiff Quantum Behavioral Solutions, Inc. Filed in State Court on 4/2/2019 Submitted with attachment 1 to notice of removal #1 . (car) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, identifying Tata Motors Limited. (Carlson, Lindsay) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Carlson, Lindsay) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV11450 Receipt No: 0973-23682567 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - State Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex B. - State Answer, #3 Exhibit Ex C. - Lease Agreement) (Attorney Lindsay G Carlson added to party Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC(pty:dft))(Carlson, Lindsay) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.