Brian Whitaker v. Glendale I Mall Associates, LP et al
| Brian Whitaker |
| Does 1-10, Glendale I Mall Associates, LP, Hot Topic, Inc. and GGP-Glendale, LLC |
| 2:2019cv03972 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Notice of Settlement #11 : The Court hereby vacates all currently set dates, with the expectation that the parties will file a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal within 60 days. (bm)
|
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Hot Topic, Inc. served on 5/16/2019, answer due 7/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY (Becky De George - Agent for Service) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Glendale I Mall Associates, LP served on 5/16/2019, answer due 6/6/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY (Becky De George-Agent for Service) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant GGP-Glendale, LLC served on 5/16/2019, answer due 6/6/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY (Becky De George - Agent for Service) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Vacate All Currently Set Dates filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Hot Topic, Inc. answer now due 7/5/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Hot Topic, Inc..(Attorney Phillip A Medlin added to party Hot Topic, Inc.(pty:dft))(Medlin, Phillip) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (wm) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants GGP-Glendale, LLC, Glendale I Mall Associates, LP, and Hot Topic, Inc. (jtil) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23688890 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
