Brianna Rivera v. Finders Seekers, LLC et al
Brianna Rivera |
Does 1-10, inclusive and Finders Seekers, LLC |
2:2019cv04053 |
May 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Otis D Wright |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Finders Seekers, LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
Filing 6 Notice of Withdrawal of Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Brianna Rivera. (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brianna Rivera. (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Brianna Rivera. (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brianna Rivera, (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brianna Rivera. (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23708395 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Brianna Rivera. (Attorney Scott J Ferrell added to party Brianna Rivera(pty:pla))(Ferrell, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.