William Erick Young v. United States Postal Service et al
William Erick Young |
Joey James Valdez, Does 1 to 25, inclusive, United States Postal Service and United States of America |
2:2019cv04094 |
May 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Patrick J Walsh |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference on 9/9/2019 at 11:00 AM. (iv) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant United States of America.(Thayer, Damon) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by PLAINTIFF William Erick Young pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to United States Postal Service. (Park, Jason) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff William Erick Young pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to United States Postal Service. (iv) |
Filing 8 ORDER Correcting Caption #5 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The name of defendant Joey James Valdez shall be deleted from the caption of this case; 2. The United States of America shall be inserted in the caption in place and instead of Joey James Valdez. (lom) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Joey James Valdez answer now due 6/17/2019; United States Postal Service answer now due 6/17/2019, filed by Defendants Joey James Valdez; United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Thayer, Damon) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendants United States Postal Service, Joey James Valdez. correcting Notice (Other) #5 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Declaration), #2 Proof of Service)(Thayer, Damon) |
Filing 5 NOTICE Substitution filed by Defendants United States Postal Service, Joey James Valdez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Thayer, Damon) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (esa) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants United States Postal Service, Joey James Valdez. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Thayer, Damon) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 19STCV08336 No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Defendants Joey James Valdez, United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Proof of Service) (Attorney Damon A Thayer added to party United States Postal Service(pty:dft), Attorney Damon A Thayer added to party Joey James Valdez(pty:dft))(Thayer, Damon) |
CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff William Erick Young, upon Defendant Joey James Valdez served on 4/26/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Joey James Valdez, defendant, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Filed in state court 5/1/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 28) (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, United States Postal Service, Joey James Valdez, filed by plaintiff William Erick Young. (Filed in state court 3/11/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.