Anita Trejo v. Lyneer Staffing Solutions, LLC et al
| Anita Trejo |
| Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc., Ciera Staffing, LLC, Employers HR LLC, Lyneer Staffing Solutions, LLC and DOES 1 thru 50, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv04132 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Anita Trejo(Perez, Alexander) |
Filing 23
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 8/3/21. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER RE JURY TRIAL by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/27/2021 at 03:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 10/26/2021 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 24 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (Held and Completed) held before Judge Dale S. Fischer. See minutes for specifics. Court Reporter: Pat Cuneo. (lom) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer, re Stipulation to Continue Deadline for Class Certification Motion #16 . (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS). (jp)
|
|
Filing 20
Order to Show Cause re Adequacy of Counsel by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS). (jp)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 18 STATUS REPORT Amended Joint Rule 26(F) Report filed by Plaintiff Anita Trejo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Trial Dates)(Perez, Alexander) |
| Filing 17 STATUS REPORT Joint Rule 26(F) Report filed by Plaintiff Anita Trejo. (Perez, Alexander) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION to Certify Class filed by Plaintiff Anita Trejo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order re Stipulation to Continue Class Certification Deadline)(Perez, Alexander) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Alexander Perez on behalf of Plaintiff Anita Trejo (Attorney Alexander Perez added to party Anita Trejo(pty:pla))(Perez, Alexander) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Lyneer Staffing Solutions, LLC #11 and Answer to Complaint filed by Defendants Ciera Staffing, LLC., Employers HR, LLC #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Other error(s) with document(s): (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants Ciera Staffing, LLC, Employers HR LLC, Lyneer Staffing Solutions, LLC.(Attorney Amrita Bimali Walgampaya added to party Ciera Staffing, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Amrita Bimali Walgampaya added to party Employers HR LLC(pty:dft))(Walgampaya, Amrita) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kevin Mahoney counsel for Plaintiff Anita Trejo. Filed by Plaintiff Anita Trejo. (Mahoney, Kevin) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Lyneer Staffing Solutions, LLC.(Attorney Amrita Bimali Walgampaya added to party Lyneer Staffing Solutions, LLC(pty:dft))(Walgampaya, Amrita) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Electronic Filing re Errata #9 e-mailed to Shooka Dadashzadeh bounced due to invalid email address. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrey) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc.. correcting Notice (Other) #7 (Lowe, Shanda) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 8/19/2019 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1446(D) filed by Defendant Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice to Plaintiff and State Court re Removal)(Lowe, Shanda) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Anita Trejo in Los Angelse Superior Court on 3/27/2019, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc., filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on 5/13/2019, attached as Exhibit G. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc.. (Lowe, Shanda) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc., (Lowe, Shanda) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 19STCV10411 Receipt No: 0973-23726140 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Shanda Y. Lowe, #2 Exhibit A to Shanda Lowe Declaration, #3 Exhibit B to Shanda Lowe Declaration, #4 Exhibit C to Shanda Lowe Declaration, #5 Exhibit D to Shanda Lowe Declaration, #6 Exhibit E to Shanda Lowe Declaration, #7 Exhibit G to Shanda Lowe Declaration, #8 Exhibit G to Shanda Lowe Declaration) (Attorney Shanda Yasmin Lowe added to party Yusen Logistics (Americas) Inc.(pty:dft))(Lowe, Shanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
