Dorian Davis v. Robert Neuschmid
Dorian Davis |
Robert Neuschmid |
2:2019cv04136 |
May 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andrew J Guilford |
Rozella A Oliver |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 19-55745 assigned to Petition for Certificate of Appealability, #6 as to Petitioner Dorian Davis. (hr) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion of Certificate of Appealability following denial of COA request by District Court, to 9TH CCA, by Petitioner Dorian Davis; Filed as Notice of Appeal to 9th CCA from District Court Judgment filed 5/24/19. Certificate of Appealability has been ruled on 5/24/19, see item (mat) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for the reasons set forth in the related Order Summarily Dismissing Successive Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Jurisdiction and Denying Certificate of Appealability #4 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr) |
Filing 4 ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Petition is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; and 2. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car) |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Dorian Davis. The Petitioner does not consent. (car) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Andrew J. Guilford and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver.(Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Dorian Davis. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dorian Davis v. Robert Neuschmid | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Dorian Davis | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Robert Neuschmid | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.