Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Roza Abrahamian et al
| Rafael Arroyo, Jr. |
| Does 1-10 and Roza Abrahamian |
| 2:2019cv04157 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. On July 5, 2019, the clerk entered default as to Defendant #13 . The Order to Show Cause dated July 1, 2019 #11 is hereby discharged. Plaintiff shall move for default judgment within 30 days of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 13 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Roza Abrahamian, in individual and representative capacity as trustee of the Abrahamian Family Trust Dated July 18, 2016. (gk) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Roza Abrahamian filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service) (Grace, Phyl) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 7/15/2019 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: An answer by the defendant(s); or, Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., upon Defendant Roza Abrahamian served on 6/7/2019, answer due 6/28/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Roza Abrahamian. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23730813 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Rafael Arroyo, Jr.(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
