Bronson Holding Company, LLC v. Geraldine Moyer et al
Bronson Holding Company, LLC |
United States of America on Behalf of Internal Revenue Service, Geraldine Moyer, Russell Reiff, Tena Moyer, The California Franchise Tax Board, Does 1 through 10 and United States of America |
Roes |
2:2019cv04175 |
May 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Manuel L Real |
Michael R Wilner |
Taxes |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to Crossclaim, #5 Answer of Cross-Defendant Bronson Holding Company, LLC To Cross-Complaint of Geraldine Moyer, as Trustee of The Geraldine Moyer Trust; Tena Moyer, as Trustee of the Tena M. Moyer Trust; Russell filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Bronson Holding Company, LLC.(Attorney Jeremy H Rothstein added to party Bronson Holding Company, LLC(pty:pla), Attorney Jeremy H Rothstein added to party Bronson Holding Company, LLC(pty:crd))(Rothstein, Jeremy) |
Filing 9 ORDER RE: NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Manuel L. Real. READ CAREFULLY - FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY LEAD TO SANCTIONS. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (cch) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing the Official Record of a State-Court Proceeding filed by Defendant United States of America. (Corrected filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Part 1, #2 Exhibit Part 2, #3 Exhibit Part 3)(Greene, Gavin) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing the Official Record of a State-Court Proceeding filed by Defendant United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Part 1, #2 Exhibit Part 2, #3 Exhibit Part 3)(Greene, Gavin) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, JURY DEMAND. filed by Defendants Geraldine Moyer, Tena Moyer, Russell Reiff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Answer to First Amended Complaint)(Murphy, Michael) |
Filing 5 CROSSCLAIM against Cross-Defendant Bronson Holding Company, LLC; Jury Demand, filed by Cross-Complainants Russell Reiff, Geraldine Moyer, Tena Moyer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Cross-Complaint) (Attorney Michael Donnelly Murphy added to party Geraldine Moyer(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Donnelly Murphy added to party Tena Moyer(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Donnelly Murphy added to party Russell Reiff(pty:dft))(Murphy, Michael) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, (Answer and Claim of the United States) filed by Defendant United States of America.(Greene, Gavin) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, Geraldine Moyer, Tena Moyer, Russell Reiff, The California Franchise Tax Board, The Internal Revenue Service amending Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by plaintiff Bronson Holding Company, LLC. Filed in State Court on 4/4/2019 Submitted with attachment 1 Exhibit 1 to notice of removal #1 (car) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant United States of America on Behalf of Internal Revenue Service. (Greene, Gavin) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles East District - Pomona, case number KC070292 No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Defendant United States of America on Behalf of Internal Revenue Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Attorney Gavin L Greene added to party United States of America on Behalf of Internal Revenue Service(pty:dft))(Greene, Gavin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.