Alla Anatolyevna Zorikova v. Kineticflix LLC et al
Plaintiff: Alla Anatolyevna Zorikova
Defendant: Does 1-5, individuals and Kineticflix LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv04214
Filed: May 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gail J Standish
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Alla Anatolyevna Zorikovas Application for Permission for Electronic Filing The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Application #8 . Plaintiff is strongly encouraged to review the Courts website regarding electronic filing:https://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/e-filing/pro-se-electronic-filing. (lc) Modified on 6/12/2019 (lc).
June 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Alla Anatolyevna Zorikova. (lc)
May 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Alla Anatolyevna Zorikova. (lc)
May 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: granting #2 Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (ec)
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (ghap)
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (ghap)
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Alla Anatolyevna Zorikova. (ghap)
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Alla Anatolyevna Zorikova. (ghap)
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-5,, Kineticflix LLC. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J Standish. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Alla Anatolyevna Zorikova. (Attachments: #1 CV-71, #2 Summons) (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alla Anatolyevna Zorikova v. Kineticflix LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alla Anatolyevna Zorikova
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-5, individuals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kineticflix LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?