Steve Croft et al v. ZF Friedrichshafen AG et al
Steve Croft and Judith Servis |
Toyota Motor Corp., Honda R&D Co., Ltd., ZF Friedrichshafen AG, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., TRW AUTOMOTIVE U.S. LLC, Honda of America Mfg., Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd., TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc., ZF TRW AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS CORP., a Delaware corporation, TRW Automotive, Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America, Inc., ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. and Honda R and D Co., Ltd. |
2:2019cv04256 |
May 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Frederick F Mumm |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. § 2301 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, places this matter on its inactive calendar pending a decision by theJudicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the Panel). Counsel shall file a joint report every 60 days, with the first report due on August 28, 2019; provided, however, a report shall be filed within five days of a decision by the Panel. Upon receiving a report with respect to an action by the Panel, the Court will determine whether the matter will be returned to its active calendar. All other dates and deadlines are vacated. The stipulations seeking an extension of time to respond to the Complaint are moot. Dkt. 33, 34,39.(MD JS-6. Case Terminated). (shb) |
Filing 39 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to TRW Automotive U.S. LLC answer now due 7/26/2019; TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. answer now due 7/26/2019; ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. answer now due 7/26/2019; TRW Automotive, Inc. answer now due 7/26/2019, filed by Defendants TRW Automotive U.S. LLC; TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc.; ZF TRW Automotive Holdings Corp.; TRW Automotive, Inc..(Tsoumas, Tammy) |
Filing 38 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance,, #31 , Notice of Appearance,, #30 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
Filing 37 Notice of Withdrawal of Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #18 filed by Plaintiffs Steve Croft, Judith Servis. (Levine, Jonathan) |
Filing 36 Notice of Withdrawal of Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #26 filed by Plaintiffs Steve Croft, Judith Servis. (Levine, Jonathan) |
Filing 35 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda of America Mfg., Inc. identifying Honda Motor Co., Ltd. and American Honda Motor Co., Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Horth-Neubert, Stacy) |
Filing 34 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Defendants American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda of America Mfg., Inc..(Attorney Stacy R Horth-Neubert added to party American Honda Motor Co., Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Stacy R Horth-Neubert added to party Honda of America Mfg., Inc.(pty:dft))(Horth-Neubert, Stacy) |
Filing 33 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendant TRW Automotive U.S. LLC, TRW Automotive, Inc., TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc., ZF TRW Automotice Holdings Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Tsoumas, Tammy) |
Filing 32 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants TRW Automotive U.S. LLC, TRW Automotive, Inc., TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc., ZF TRW Automotice Holdings Corp. identifying ZF Friedrichshafen AG as Corporate Parent. (Tsoumas, Tammy) |
Filing 31 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Tammy Ann Tsoumas on behalf of Defendants TRW Automotive U.S. LLC, TRW Automotive, Inc., TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc., ZF TRW Automotice Holdings Corp. (Attorney Tammy Ann Tsoumas added to party TRW Automotive U.S. LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Tammy Ann Tsoumas added to party TRW Automotive, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Tammy Ann Tsoumas added to party TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Tammy Ann Tsoumas added to party ZF TRW Automotice Holdings Corp. (pty:dft))(Tsoumas, Tammy) |
Filing 30 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Mark C Holscher on behalf of Defendants TRW Automotive U.S. LLC, TRW Automotive, Inc., TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc., ZF TRW Automotice Holdings Corp. (Attorney Mark C Holscher added to party TRW Automotive U.S. LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Mark C Holscher added to party TRW Automotive, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Mark C Holscher added to party TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Mark C Holscher added to party ZF TRW Automotice Holdings Corp. (pty:dft))(Holscher, Mark) |
Filing 29 Notice of Withdrawal of Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #20 filed by Plaintiffs Steve Croft, Judith Servis. (Levine, Jonathan) |
Filing 28 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #18 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #17 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #23 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #22 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #20 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #24 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #19 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #21 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #25 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #27 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #26 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. The proof of service of summons and complaint is missing the judge initials. The complete case number is 2:19-cv-04256-JAK (FFMx) Other error(s) with document(s): The document is accepted as filed. Counsel shall take notice of the CM/ECF procedures. Any future documents will be stricken for failure to follow the procedures. (shb) |
Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Judith Servis, Steve Croft, upon Defendant ZF TRW Automotice Holdings Corp. served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Chelsea Delapaz, CSC/Prentice Hall, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Haggarty, Heather) |
Filing 26 [DOCUMENT WITHDRAWN PER DKT #36 . PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Judith Servis, Steve Croft, upon Defendant ZF Friedrichshafen AG served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Chelsea Delapaz, CSC/Prentice Hall, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Haggarty, Heather) Modified on 6/21/2019 (shb). |
Filing 25 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Judith Servis, Steve Croft, upon Defendant TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Chelsea Delapaz, CSC/Prentice Hall, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Haggarty, Heather) |
Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Judith Servis, Steve Croft, upon Defendant TRW Automotive U.S. LLC served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Chelsea Delapaz, CSC/Prentice Hall, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Haggarty, Heather) |
Filing 23 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Judith Servis, Steve Croft, upon Defendant TRW Automotive, Inc. served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Chelsea Delapaz, CSC/Prentice Hall, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Haggarty, Heather) |
Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Judith Servis, Steve Croft, upon Defendant Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. served on 6/5/2019, answer due 7/26/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carlos Paz, CT Corp, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Haggarty, Heather) |
Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Judith Servis, Steve Croft, upon Defendant Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America, Inc. served on 6/5/2019, answer due 7/26/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carlos Paz, CT Corp, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Haggarty, Heather) |
Filing 20 [WITHDRAWN PER DKT. #29 ] PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Judith Servis, Steve Croft, upon Defendant Toyota Motor Corp. served on 6/5/2019, answer due 6/26/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carlos Paz, CT Corp, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Haggarty, Heather) Modified on 6/18/2019 (ake). |
Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Judith Servis, Steve Croft, upon Defendant Honda of America Mfg., Inc. served on 6/5/2019, answer due 6/26/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Dee Dee Brust, Statutory Agent Corp., Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Haggarty, Heather) |
Filing 18 [DOCUMENT WITHDRAWN PER DKT #37 . PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Judith Servis, Steve Croft, upon Defendant Honda Motor Co., Ltd. served on 6/5/2019, answer due 6/26/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carlos Paz, CT Corp, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Haggarty, Heather) Modified on 6/21/2019 (shb). |
Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Judith Servis, Steve Croft, upon Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. served on 6/5/2019, answer due 6/26/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carlos Paz, CT Corp, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Haggarty, Heather) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America, Inc. answer now due 7/26/2019; Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. answer now due 7/26/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America, Inc.; Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc..(Attorney Amir M Nassihi added to party Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Amir M Nassihi added to party Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.(pty:dft))(Nassihi, Amir) |
Filing 15 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Courts Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. (shb) |
Filing 14 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER OF CASE TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT (DKT. #13 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: This action has been reassigned to the Honorable John A. Kronstadt, United States District Judge. The case number will now read: LA CV19-04256 JAK (FFMx). Because all pleadings are routed using the judge's initials, please be sure to use the initials JAK in place of the initials DSF on all future filings. Judge Kronstadt's Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Andrea Keifer, can be reached at 213.894.2156. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 13 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:19-cv-00782 JAK(FFMx). Case transferred from Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott to Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-04256 JAK(FFMx). Signed by Judge John A. Kronstadt (rn) |
Filing 12 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendants ZF Friedrichshafen AG, ZF TRW Automotice Holdings Corp., TRW Automotive, Inc., TRW Automotive U.S. LLC, TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc., Honda Motor Co., Ltd., American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda of America Mfg., Inc., Honda R&D Co., Ltd., Toyota Motor Corp., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., and Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. (gk) |
Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,,, #10 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs Steve Croft, Judith Servis. (Levine, Jonathan) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write "see attached."Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The phrase "et. al," should not be used on the Summons form. Please place the case number, 2:19-cv-04256-DSF-JEMx, in the space provided. Separate attachments should clearly identify which sections of the summons the attachments belong to. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (gk) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiffs Steve Croft, Judith Servis. (Levine, Jonathan) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding (Civ. L.R. 83-1.4.2) filed by Plaintiffs Steve Croft, Judith Servis. (Levine, Jonathan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Levine, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Steve Croft, Judith Servis. (Levine, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23751312 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Judith Servis, Steve Croft. (Attorney Jonathan K Levine added to party Steve Croft(pty:pla), Attorney Jonathan K Levine added to party Judith Servis(pty:pla))(Levine, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.