Enrique Lopez v. Quinones-Medina et al
| Enrique Lopez |
| Roberto Banuelos and Quinones-Medina |
| 2:2019cv04353 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: denying #2 Notice of Filing Complaint Without Prepayment of Filing Fees or REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (CV-93). MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (yl)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Re NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) #2 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(bem) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93). (ghap) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Enrique Lopez pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth., filed by plaintiff Enrique Lopez. (ghap) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/24/2019: #1 CV-71) (ghap). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
