Brian Whitaker v. Windsor Associates, LTD. et al
Plaintiff: Brian Whitaker
Defendant: Windsor Associates, LTD., Does 1-10 and La Pearls Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv04380
Filed: May 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Frederick F Mumm
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2019 Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Windsor Associates, LTD. answer now due 7/26/2019, filed by Defendant Windsor Associates, LTD..(Attorney Eric Meller added to party Windsor Associates, LTD.(pty:dft))(Meller, Eric)
June 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson re: Notice of Settlement #14 . The Court has been advised by counsel that this matter has settled. The parties have ten (10) days from the date of this order or until the next scheduled court appearance, whichever is shorter, to file with the court a dismissal of the action or to appear, in-person or telephonically with their clients, to place the settlement on the record. (mrgo)
June 26, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda)
June 26, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock on behalf of Plaintiff Brian Whitaker (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Seabock, Amanda)
June 24, 2019 Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to La Pearls Inc. answer now due 7/19/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant La Pearls Inc..(Attorney Laurie M Cortez added to party La Pearls Inc.(pty:dft))(Cortez, Laurie)
June 20, 2019 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant La Pearls Inc. served on 5/30/2019, answer due 6/20/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: ANDREW PARK in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
June 12, 2019 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Windsor Associates, LTD. served on 6/7/2019, answer due 6/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: LAWRENCE N. TAYLOR in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (mrgo)
May 23, 2019 Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss)
May 22, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants La Pearls Inc., Windsor Associates, LTD. (lh)
May 22, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
May 22, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (lh)
May 20, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell)
May 20, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell)
May 20, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell)
May 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23773310 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brian Whitaker v. Windsor Associates, LTD. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Windsor Associates, LTD.
Represented By: Eric Meller
Represented By: Harry E Floyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: La Pearls Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Gene Emilio
Represented By: Laurie M Cortez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Whitaker
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Represented By: Phyl Grace
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?