Brian Whitaker v. Magnum Property Investment LLC et al
| Brian Whitaker |
| Does 1-10, Magnum Property Investment LLC, 13705 Ventura, Inc., Petit Trois Le Valley, L.P., Norman H. Leibson and Jeri E. Leibson |
| 2:2019cv04419 |
| May 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J Standish |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Petit Trois Le Valley, L.P. served on 6/11/2019, answer due 7/2/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: JEFFREY PRICE in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Brian Whitaker answer now due 7/26/2019, filed by Defendant Petit Trois Le Valley, L.P..(Attorney Desmond J Collins added to party Petit Trois Le Valley, L.P.(pty:dft))(Collins, Desmond) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #11 as to defendants Jeri E. Leibson, Norman H. Leibson. (mrgo) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants 13705 Ventura, Inc., Does, Petit Trois Le Valley, L.P., Norman H. Leibson, Jeri E. Leibson amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant 13705 Ventura, Inc. served on 6/15/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Warren Nicholson - Manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Magnum Property Investment LLC served on 6/3/2019, answer due 6/24/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY - (Becky De George - Agent for Service) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 8
Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials by Judge George H. Wu. (lom)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants 13705 Ventura, Inc., Magnum Property Investment LLC, Petit Trois Le Valley, L.P. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23782189 - Fee: $400, filed by pl Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
