AndCake, Inc. v. Johnny Was, LLC et al
AndCake, Inc. |
Johnny Was, LLC, DOES and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2019cv04430 |
May 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
R Gary Klausner |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Johnny Was, LLC, identifying Johnny Was LLC. (Seror, Matthew) |
Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Other error(s) with document(s): (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #13 JURY DEMAND. Answer to First Amended Complaint; Demand for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Johnny Was, LLC.(Attorney Matthew Lawrence Seror added to party Johnny Was, LLC(pty:dft))(Seror, Matthew) |
Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff AndCake, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Lauson, Robert) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff AndCake, Inc., upon Defendant Johnny Was, LLC served on 5/28/2019, answer due 6/18/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Eli Levite/Maria Mendoza on behalf of JOHNNY WAS LLC in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Lauson, Robert) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Johnny Was, LLC. (lc) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff AndCake, Inc.. (Lauson, Robert) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #5 . The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff AndCake, Inc.. (Lauson, Robert) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by AndCake, Inc.. (Lauson, Robert) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff AndCake, Inc., identifying AndCake, Inc.; Johnny Was, LLC. (Lauson, Robert) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff AndCake, Inc.. (Lauson, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23783247 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff AndCake, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Robert J Lauson added to party AndCake, Inc.(pty:pla))(Lauson, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.