Rave Wonderland, Inc. v. City Lingerie, Inc. et al
| Rave Wonderland, Inc. |
| City Lingerie, Inc. d/b/a Raveland, Navid Javidzad, City Lingerie, Inc., Does 1 through 10 and City Lingerie, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Raveland |
| 2:2019cv04546 |
| May 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Other error(s) with document(s): The case number is missing the judge initials. The complete case number is 2:19-cv-04546 RSWL (MRWx). This case number must be all all documents filed with the Court.The document is accepted as filed. Counsel shall take notice of the CM/ECF procedures. Any future document will be stricken for failure to follow the procedures. (shb) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants City Lingerie, Inc., City Lingerie, Inc. d/b/a Raveland, Navid Javidzad. Motion set for hearing on 8/13/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Nicholas Duane Myers added to party City Lingerie, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas Duane Myers added to party City Lingerie, Inc. d/b/a Raveland(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas Duane Myers added to party Navid Javidzad(pty:dft)) (Myers, Nicholas) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF COURT ORDER filed by Plaintiff Rave Wonderland, Inc.. (Beral, Arash) |
Filing 12
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff /s to show cause in writing no later than July 8, 2019, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and sanctions imposed on counsel. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendant/s Answer/Response to the Complaint/Plaintiffs Request for Entry of Defaulton defendant/s OR appropriate request for dismissal of this action. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff/s is due. Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all named parties in this action who have beenserved but have not yet appeared. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions including the dismissal of this action. (shb)
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rave Wonderland, Inc., upon Defendant Navid Javidzad served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Yaditha Vasquez (On-Site Manager) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Beral, Arash) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rave Wonderland, Inc., upon Defendant City Lingerie, Inc. d/b/a Raveland served on 6/4/2019, answer due 6/25/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Yaditha Vasquez (On-Site Manager) for Navid Javidzad (Registered Agent for Service of Process) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Beral, Arash) |
| Filing 9 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Rave Wonderland, Inc.. (Beral, Arash) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants City Lingerie, Inc., Navid Javidzad. (shb) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Rave Wonderland, Inc.. (Mizrahi, Mark) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rave Wonderland, Inc., identifying Rave Wonderland, Inc.; City Lingerie, Inc. d/b/a Raveland; Navid Javidzad. (Mizrahi, Mark) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rave Wonderland, Inc.. (Mizrahi, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23801636 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Rave Wonderland, Inc.. (Attorney Mark B Mizrahi added to party Rave Wonderland, Inc.(pty:pla))(Mizrahi, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
