Carmen John Perri v. Farm-To-Table Eats, Inc. et al
| Carmen John Perri |
| FARM-TO-TABLE EATS, INC., a California corporation, HILL UP LLC, a California limited liability company, Does 1-10, Inclusive,, Does 1-10, inclusive, Hill Up LLC and Farm-To-Table Eats, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv04668 |
| May 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson: ORDER. The Court has been advised by counsel that this matter has settled. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement and response to OSC filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Percy Anderson: In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before July 5, 2019 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See minutes for further details) (yl)
|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, upon Defendant Farm-To-Table Eats, Inc. served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, upon Defendant Hill Up LLC served on 6/6/2019, answer due 6/27/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation Early and Stay Mediation Program. See Notice for complete details. (jre) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Hill Up LLC. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Farm-To-Table Eats, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (et) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri, (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Manning, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23822379 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Carmen John Perri. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party Carmen John Perri(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
