Martin Chacon Lopez et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Plaintiff: Dolores Torres and Martin Chacon Lopez
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, South Bay Ford, Ford Motor Company doing business as South Bay Ford and South Bay Ford, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv04779
Filed: May 31, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Frederick F Mumm
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2019 Filing 14 Receipt of Order of Remand filed. (mrgo)
July 22, 2019 Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (mrgo)
July 18, 2019 Filing 12 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Hearing held before Judge George H. Wu. The Court's Tentative Ruling on Remand for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is circulated and attached hereto. Court hears oral argument. Based on the Tentative, and for reasons stated on the record, the Court orders this matter remanded to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, County of Los Angeles for further proceedings. Court Reporter: Katie E. Thibodeaux. (mrgo)
July 15, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiffs Martin Chacon Lopez, Dolores Torres. Motion set for hearing on 8/15/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration of Anh Nguyen in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proposed Order) (Nguyen, Anh)
July 8, 2019 Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiffs Martin Chacon Lopez, Dolores Torres.. (Nguyen, Anh)
June 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. (Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/8/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 7/18/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
June 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
June 5, 2019 Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Anh X Nguyen counsel for Plaintiffs Martin Chacon Lopez, Dolores Torres. Adding Anh X. Nguyen as counsel of record for Plaintiffs Martin Chacon Lopez and Dolores Torres for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Anh X. Nguyen. (Attorney Anh X Nguyen added to party Martin Chacon Lopez(pty:pla), Attorney Anh X Nguyen added to party Dolores Torres(pty:pla))(Nguyen, Anh)
June 4, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
June 4, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (et)
May 31, 2019 CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Ford Motor Company, South Bay Ford, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiffs Martin Chacon Lopez, Dolores Torres. [FILED IN STATE COURT 4/30/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et)
May 31, 2019 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT D AS ATTACHMENT NO. 4 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et)
May 31, 2019 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant South Bay Ford, Inc. dba South Bay Ford and incorrectly named in the Complaint as South Bay Ford. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT E AS ATTACHMENT NO. 5 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 .(et)
May 31, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant South Bay Ford, identifying South Bay Ford, Inc.. (Harlow, Charles)
May 31, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Corporation; Evercore Trust Company, N.A.; Black Rock, Inc.; The Vanguard Group. (Harlow, Charles)
May 31, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, South Bay Ford. (Harlow, Charles)
May 31, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 19STCV15060 Receipt No: 0973-23839817 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants South Bay Ford, Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Ntc of Service of Process, #2 Exhibit B-Original Complaint, #3 Exhibit C-Original Summons, #4 Exhibit D-Answer OBO Ford Motor Company, #5 Exhibit E-Answer OBO South Bay Ford, #6 Exhibit F-Dealer's Invoice, #7 Exhibit G-Ford's 2017 10-K Filing Excerpt, #8 Declaration of Charles F. Harlow In Support of Removal) (Attorney Charles Frederick Harlow added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft), Attorney Charles Frederick Harlow added to party South Bay Ford(pty:dft))(Harlow, Charles)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin Chacon Lopez et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dolores Torres
Represented By: Tionna Dolin
Represented By: Anh X Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin Chacon Lopez
Represented By: Tionna Dolin
Represented By: Anh X Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Charles Frederick Harlow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South Bay Ford
Represented By: Charles Frederick Harlow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company doing business as South Bay Ford
Represented By: Charles Frederick Harlow
Represented By: Stephen H Dye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: South Bay Ford, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen H Dye
Represented By: Charles Frederick Harlow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?