Shin Ho Kang v. United States of America
Petitioner: Shin Ho Kang
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2019cv04788
Filed: May 31, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Shin Ho Kang. (Robertson, John)
May 31, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, Pursuant to 28 USC 2255 in Criminal Case No. 18-325, filed by Petitioner Shin Ho Kang. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Affidavit of Joseph Kang, #3 Affidavit of Steve S. Chang, #4 Affidavit of Shin Ho Kang) (Attorney John D Robertson added to party Shin Ho Kang(pty:pet))(Robertson, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shin Ho Kang v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Shin Ho Kang
Represented By: John D Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?