Patrick Buchanan et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Pauline Buchanan and Patrick Buchanan
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv04824
Filed: June 3, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Manuel L Real
Referring Judge: Patrick J Walsh
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2019 Filing 21 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: The Honorable R. Gary Klausner, United States District Judge, will be handling this case pending reassignment. Until reassignment of the case, counsel and parties shall continue to send mandatory chambers copies of all electronically filed documents, to courtroom 880 on the 8th Floor of the Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and send proposed orders to R_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. All appropriate oral and written communication shall continue to be directed to Christine Chung, Courtroom Deputy Clerk to Judge Real. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 30, 2019 Filing 20 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge R. Gary Klausner. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by August 2, 2019. (cch)
July 29, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Dana J. Ash to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24157580) #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Attached Certificate of Good Standing not issued within 30 days prior to filing of the application. (lt)
July 26, 2019 Filing 18 *STRICKEN BY RESPONSE DATED 07/30/19 #20 * APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Dana J. Ash to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24157580) filed by Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Parvaresh, Romtin) Modified on 7/30/2019 (cch).
July 25, 2019 Filing 17 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Dana J. Ash. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (gk)
July 25, 2019 Filing 16 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc., (Parvaresh, Romtin)
July 25, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
July 18, 2019 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc..(Attorney Romtin Parvaresh added to party Wright Medical Technology, Inc.(pty:dft))(Parvaresh, Romtin)
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Judge Manuel L. Real Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney N. Kirkland Pope to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Patrick Buchanan and Pauline Buchanan, designating Christopher P. Yuhl as local counsel #11 . (gk)
June 17, 2019 Filing 12 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Patrick Buchanan, Pauline Buchanan, upon Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. served on 6/13/2019, answer due 7/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Carr, James)
June 7, 2019 Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Neal Kirkland Pope to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Patrick Buchanan, Pauline Buchanan (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23882256) filed by Plaintiffs Patrick Buchanan, Pauline Buchanan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Carr, James)
June 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RE: NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Manuel L. Real. READ CAREFULLY - FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY LEAD TO SANCTIONS. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (cch)
June 4, 2019 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Wright Medical Technology, Inc. (ghap)
June 4, 2019 Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Patrick Buchanan, Pauline Buchanan. (Carr, James)
June 4, 2019 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Patrick Buchanan, Pauline Buchanan, identifying Patrick Buchanan, Pauline Buchanan, Wright Medical Technology, Inc.. (Carr, James)
June 4, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet, 2 Summons are attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap)
June 4, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Please put for the Central District of California. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap)
June 4, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap)
June 4, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney N. Kirkland Pope. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap)
June 4, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (ghap)
June 3, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23848604 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Patrick Buchanan, Pauline Buchanan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Attorney James Patrick Carr added to party Patrick Buchanan(pty:pla), Attorney James Patrick Carr added to party Pauline Buchanan(pty:pla))(Carr, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patrick Buchanan et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pauline Buchanan
Represented By: James Patrick Carr
Represented By: Christopher P Yuhl
Represented By: N Kirkland Pope
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Buchanan
Represented By: James Patrick Carr
Represented By: Christopher P Yuhl
Represented By: N Kirkland Pope
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
Represented By: John Robert Renner
Represented By: Dana J Ash
Represented By: Romtin Parvaresh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?