Irene Reza v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Irene Reza |
Commissioner Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill |
2:2019cv04832 |
June 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV19-4832 AFM on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Stacy Wiesbrock added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Wiesbrock, Stacy) |
Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Irene Reza, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 6/20/2019, answer due 10/18/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Perales, Monica) |
Filing 10 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDERREGARDING FURTHERPROCEEDINGS by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Mandatory chambers copies of e-filed documents shall be delivered to the Magistrate Judges box located outside the Clerk's Office, 12th Floor, Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, within twenty-four hours after e-filing. (See document for details.) (sbou) |
Filing 9 (In Chambers): ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL upon filing of the complaint by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Plaintiff will promptly serve the summons and complaint on the government in accordance with Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff will file an appropriate proof of service within 30 days of the date of this Order. Government counsel must file a notice of appearance within 30 days of service of the action. (See document for details.) (sbou) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (sbou) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (sbou) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Irene Reza, (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Irene Reza. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Irene Reza. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Irene Reza. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Irene Reza. (Attorney Monica Perales added to party Irene Reza(pty:pla))(Perales, Monica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.