Gabriel Marquez v. Stu Sherman
Petitioner: Gabriel Marquez
Respondent: Stu Sherman
Case Number: 2:2019cv04863
Filed: June 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Douglas F McCormick
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is Granted to and including August 28, 2019, to file an Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus re #7 APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File. (et)
July 23, 2019 Filing 7 First APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; DECLARATION OF TONI R. JOHNS ESTAVILLE; [PROPOSED] ORDER filed by Respondent Stu Sherman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Estaville, Toni)
July 17, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Respondent Stu Sherman. Related Case(s): Steven Vicente Simmons v. Raymond Madden, Warden, California State Prison, Centinela, CV 19-05602-DOC (PLA) (Estaville, Toni)
June 19, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Deputy Attorney General Toni R. Johns Estaville on behalf of Respondent Stu Sherman. (Attorney Toni R Johns Estaville added to party Stu Sherman(pty:res))(Estaville, Toni)
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (nbo)
June 4, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap)
June 4, 2019 Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Gabriel Marquez. The Petitioner does not consent. (ghap)
June 4, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Gabriel Marquez. (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gabriel Marquez v. Stu Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gabriel Marquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stu Sherman
Represented By: Toni R Johns Estaville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?