Sung Choi v. Calida, Inc. et al
Sung Choi |
Does 1 through 10, Calida, Inc., Wilshire Park Place 3660, LLC and Calida, Inc. doing business as Cafe Monaco |
2:2019cv04909 |
June 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Michael R Wilner |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (mrgo) |
Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Calida, Inc., Wilshire Park Place 3660, LLC. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff SUNG CHOI, (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff SUNG CHOI. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff SUNG CHOI. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23868097 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff SUNG CHOI. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party SUNG CHOI(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.