Rosalina Reyes v. Andrew Saul
| Rosalina Reyes |
| Andrew Saul |
| 2:2019cv04921 |
| June 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Gail J Standish |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Timothy R Bolin added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Bolin, Timothy)
|
|
Filing 9
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Rosalina Reyes, Case Management Order served on June 25, 2019. (Koenig, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 8
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rosalina Reyes, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 6/24/2019, answer due 10/22/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Deborah L. Stachel, Regional Chief Counsel, Office of the Regional Chief Counsel-Region IX. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Koenig, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (ec)
|
|
Filing 6
60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Andrew Saul. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rosalina Reyes, identifying Joe Solomon. (Koenig, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rosalina Reyes. (Koenig, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Rosalina Reyes. (Koenig, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23870803 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Rosalina Reyes. (Attorney Andrew Thomas Koenig added to party Rosalina Reyes(pty:pla))(Koenig, Andrew)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rosalina Reyes v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Timothy R Bolin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rosalina Reyes | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Thomas Koenig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
