Jamar Dewayne Greer v. United States of America
Petitioner: Jamar Dewayne Greer
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2019cv04951
Filed: June 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dean D Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2019 Filing 7 REPLY Support of Motion filed by Petitioner Jamar Dewayne Greer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Romano, Michael)
July 2, 2019 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for Relief Pursuant to 28 USC 2255 filed by Respondent United States of America. (Torres, Marina)
June 27, 2019 Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Marina A Torres counsel for Respondent United States of America. Adding Marina A. Torres as counsel of record for USA for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by respondent USA. (Attorney Marina A Torres added to party United States of America(pty:res))(Torres, Marina)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING RETURN TO SECTION 2255 MOTION by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Attorney file a return to the motion on/orbefore July 1, 2019, accompanied by all records, and that respondent serve a copy of the return upon petitioner prior to the filing thereof. NO EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED EXCEPT FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN UNDER EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the petitioner desires to file a traverse to the return, he shall do so by July 22, 2019, setting forth separately: (a) his admission or denial of any new factual allegations of the return, and (b) any additional legal arguments. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if any pleading or other paper submitted to be filed and considered by the Court does not include a certificate of service upon respondent, or counsel forrespondent, it will be stricken from this case and disregarded by the Court. (shb)
June 10, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson for motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (jtil)
June 6, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, Pursuant to 28 USC 2255 in Criminal Case No. CR 06-00466 DDP, filed by Petitioner Jamar Dewayne Greer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Romano, Michael)
June 6, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence, Pursuant to 28 USC 2255 in Criminal Case No. 06-cr-00466, filed by Petitioner Jamar Dewayne Greer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Michael Stone Romano added to party Jamar Dewayne Greer(pty:bkmov))(Romano, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jamar Dewayne Greer v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jamar Dewayne Greer
Represented By: Michael Stone Romano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Marina A Torres
Represented By: Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney LA-CR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?