Sanrio, Inc. v. FAB Starpoint LLC
| Sanrio, Inc. |
| FAB Starpoint LLC |
| 2:2019cv04977 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Receipt of Order of Remand filed. (mrgo) |
| Filing 12 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (mrgo) |
Filing 11
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Case remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case number 19TRCV00410. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendant FAB Starpoint LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Joint Stipulation to Remand Case)(Kaufman, Aryeh) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 7/22/2019 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 8
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Joseph Lipari. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jason Sultzer. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (esa) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FAB Starpoint LLC. (Kaufman, Aryeh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FAB Starpoint LLC, (Kaufman, Aryeh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior - Torrance Courthouse, case number 19TRCV00410 Receipt No: 0973-23882477 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant FAB Starpoint LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit ''A'' - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit ''B'' - State Civil Case Cover Sheet and Addendum Thereto, #3 Exhibit ''C'' - State Court Notice of Case Assignment and Notice of Case Management Conference, #4 Exhibit ''D'' - Proof of Service of State Complaint, #5 Exhibit ''E'' - Order to Show Cause Hearing) (Attorney Aryeh L Kaufman added to party FAB Starpoint LLC(pty:dft))(Kaufman, Aryeh) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE executed by Plaintiff Sanrio, Inc., upon Defendant FAB Starpoint LLC served on 5/10/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Edward Doe, Manager, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (Filed in state court 5/17/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 4) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendant FAB Starpoint LLC, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Sanrio, Inc. (Filed in state court 5/8/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sanrio, Inc. v. FAB Starpoint LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FAB Starpoint LLC | |
| Represented By: | Aryeh L Kaufman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sanrio, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Mark Andrew Grannis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
