Maryam Halpern v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
| Maryam Halpern |
| Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv04981 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Otis D Wright |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court, No. 19STCV04630 (lc) |
| Filing 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation for Remand #13 , the Court hereby REMANDS this action to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. 19STCV04630, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles,California, 90012. Consequently, Plaintiffs Motion to Remand #10 is DENIED ASMOOT. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) |
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendant Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Remand)(Olivia, Maija) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #10 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The document is accepted as filed. (lc) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Missing formal LR 6.1 formal Notice of Motion text paragraph re hearing date, time, Judge and courtroom and street location information In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 10 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Maryam Halpern. Motion set for hearing on 8/12/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Halpern, Jesse) |
| Filing 9 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On July 3, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand. Plaintiff does not include a statement indicating Plaintiff met and conferred with counsel for Defendant as required by Local Rule 7-3. Also, Plaintiff noticed the motion for hearing on Friday, August 9, 2019, before Judge Birotte. This case is before Judge Otis D. Wright II, who hears civil motions on Mondays at 1:30 p.m. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES Plaintiffs Motion to Remand #8 . Plaintiff may refile her motion in compliance with the Local Rules and this Courts Law and Motion Schedule. (lc) Modified on 7/3/2019 (lc). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Maryam Halpern. Motion set for hearing on 8/9/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Halpern, Jesse) Modified on 7/3/2019 (lc). (STRICKEN PER 7/3/19 MINUTES) |
Filing 7
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 8/19//19 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION; PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
| NON CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. in Los Angeles Superior Court on 6/7/2019, attached as Exhibit B. (jtil) |
| COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Maryam Halpern in Los Angeles Superior Court on 2/11/2019, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., (Olivia, Maija) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.. (Olivia, Maija) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County, case number 19STCV04630 Receipt No: 0973-23882900 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Maija Olivia added to party Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (pty:dft))(Olivia, Maija) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
