Joseph Sparks v. Equifax Information Service, LLC et al
| JOSEPH SPARKS |
| EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC d/b/a LOANMART, Trans Union, LLC, SIERRA CREDIT CORPORATION, Wheels Financial Group, LLC and Wheels Financial Group, LLC doing business as Loanmart |
| 2:2019cv04991 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sierra Credit Corporation. (yl) |
| Filing 17 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Joseph Sparks. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Caption)(Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 16 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Trans Union LLC. (gk) |
| Filing 15 ALIAS SUMMONS issued as to Defendant Wheels Financial Group LLC dba Loanmart. (gk) |
| Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Joseph Sparks. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Caption)(Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by PLAINTIFF Joseph Sparks. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Caption)(Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jtil) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Equifax Information Services, LLC, and Wheels Financial Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Equifax) (jtil) |
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH SPARKS, identifying Previn A. Wick. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Complaint Cover Page)(Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH SPARKS. (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH SPARKS. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH SPARKS. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by PLAINTIFF JOSEPH SPARKS. (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH SPARKS. (Wick, Previn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23885726 - Fee: $400, filed by PLAINTIFF JOSEPH SPARKS. (Attorney Previn A Wick added to party JOSEPH SPARKS(pty:pla))(Wick, Previn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
