Carolyn Johnson v. Orchard Supply Company, LLC
| Carolyn Johnson |
| Orchard Supply Company, LLC, DOES 1 through 50, inclusive and Orchard Supply Company, LLC a business entity doing business as Orchard Supply Hardware |
| 2:2019cv05031 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Steve Kim |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER RE JURY TRIAL by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Last Day to Add Parties/Amend Pleadings 11/18/2019. Non-expert Discovery Cut-off 10/14/2020. Last Day to Hear Motions 10/19/2020. File Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law, Exhibit and Witness Lists, Status Report regarding settlement, and all Motions in Limine 12/7/2020. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 1/4/2021 at 11:00 AM. Trial Date (Est. 7 Days) set for 1/19/2021 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 11/2/2020. (iv)
|
| Filing 11 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Case called and counsel make their appearance. The Scheduling Conference held. The Court sets dates. Please see separate Order Re Jury Trial, also filed today. Court Reporter: Amy Diaz. (iv) |
| Filing 10 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendant Orchard Supply Company, LLC. Exhibit A as to Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #9 . (Rivera, Diana) |
| Filing 9 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Defendant Orchard Supply Company, LLC.. (Forman, Stephanie) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Service re Removal from State Court filed by Defendant Orchard Supply Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Service)(Rivera, Diana) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference on 8/5/2019 at 11:00 AM. (iv)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Orchard Supply Company, LLC in San Luis Obispo Superior Court on 5/6/2019, attached as Exhibit B.(jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Carolyn Johnson in San Luis Obispo Superior Court on 4/8/2019, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Orchard Supply Company, LLC.. (Forman, Stephanie) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Orchard Supply Company, LLC, (Forman, Stephanie) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Orchard Supply Company, LLC. (Forman, Stephanie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Luis Obispo, case number 19CV-0203 Receipt No: 0973-23892391 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Orchard Supply Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Stephanie Forman added to party Orchard Supply Company, LLC(pty:dft))(Forman, Stephanie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
