Jose Madrigal v. United States
| Jose Madrigal |
| United States and DOES 1-100 |
| 2:2019cv05041 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 33
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. #29 #32 (ch)
|
|
Filing 32
NOTICE OF LODGING filed [Proposed] Order re Stipulation for Protective Order #29 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lacayo, Fatimargentina)
|
|
Filing 31
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.4, counsel for defendant shall immediately submit a separate proposed order in connection with Docket Entry 29 (to the Judge's generic email address) in Word or Word Perfect format. #29 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 30
ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND PRETRIAL FILING DATES #28 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: Last day for fact discovery shall be extended from September 8, 2020 to November 17, 2020. Last day for filing of motions shall be extended from November 3, 2020 to December 22, 2020. Final pretrial conference shall remain on January 26, 2021. Trial shall remain on February 23, 2021 (SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIC DEADLINES). (lc)
|
|
Filing 29
STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant United States.(Lacayo, Fatimargentina)
|
|
Filing 28
Joint STIPULATION for Order Extend Pretrial Filing Dates, STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File filed by Defendant United States. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Fatima Lacayo, #2 Proposed Order)(Lacayo, Fatimargentina)
|
|
Filing 27
DISCLOSURE of Initial 20.6 Disclosure filed by Plaintiff Jose Madrigal (Conroy, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 26
AMENDED MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Scheduling Conference, set for February 18, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., is hereby ADVANCED to this date and taken OFF-CALENDAR. No appearance necessary on February 18, 2020. The Court finds the matter suitable for decision without oral argument and sets the following dates - Deadline to Amend Pleadings:04-01-20; Discovery Cut-Off:09-08-20; Expert Cut-Off:10-06-20; Motion Filing Cut-Off:11-03-20; Final Pretrial Conference: 01-26-21, 10:00 am; and Jury Trial (2-6 day est) : 02-23-21, 09:00 am. All other dates applicable to this action which are not specifically set herein or otherwise ordered by this Court shall be governed by applicable Local Rules of Court for the Central District of California and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (Amended to correct Expert Cut Off and Motion Filing Cut Off Dates.) (jre) Modified on 2/14/2020 (jre).
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 11 days before trial. (jre)
|
|
Filing 24
**SEE AMENDED ORDER AT #26 ** MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Scheduling Conference, set for February 18, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., is hereby ADVANCED to this date and taken OFF-CALENDAR. No appearance necessary on February 18, 2020. The Court finds the matter suitable for decision without oral argument and sets the following dates - Deadline to Amend Pleadings:04-01-20; Discovery Cut-Off:09-08-20; Expert Cut-Off:11-03-20; Motion Filing Cut-Off:10-06-20; Final Pretrial Conference: 01-26-21, 10:00 am; and Jury Trial (2-6 day est) : 02-23-21, 09:00 am. All other dates applicable to this action which are not specifically set herein or otherwise ordered by this Court shall be governed by applicable Local Rules of Court for the Central District of California and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jre) Modified on 2/14/2020 (jre).
|
|
Filing 23
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial six to eight days, filed by Defendant United States.. (Lacayo, Fatimargentina)
|
|
Filing 22
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Scheduling Conference set for 2/18/2020 at 10:00 AM. See order for complete details. (jre)
|
|
Filing 21
ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant United States.(Lacayo, Fatimargentina)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #19 , by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Plaintiffs time to serve process is extended up to and including the date of service in this instant (October 2, 2019); and Defendants time to respond to the Complaint is extended up to and including January 2, 2020. (shb)
|
|
Filing 19
First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jose Madrigal answer now due 1/2/2020; United States answer now due 1/2/2020, filed by Plaintiff Jose Madrigal. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Veronica Fuentes, #2 Proposed Order)(Conroy, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 18
TEXT ONLY ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew re: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer #17 . The stipulation is denied without prejudice. The parties have failed to substantiate the service of the United States on on October 4, 2019. Plaintiff has also failed to request an extension of service of process. The parties should meet and confer and provide the Court with a stipulation addressing good cause to extend service of process and extension of time to answer. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jre)
|
|
Filing 17
STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to United States answer now due 12/17/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant United States.(Lacayo, Fatimargentina)
|
|
Filing 16
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Fatimargentina M Lacayo counsel for Defendant United States. Adding FATIMA LACAYO as counsel of record for United States for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant United States. (Attorney Fatimargentina M Lacayo added to party United States(pty:dft))(Lacayo, Fatimargentina)
|
|
Filing 15
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Madrigal, upon Defendant United States served on 7/23/2019, answer due 9/23/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Conroy, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant United States #13 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: No certified return receipt on the US Attorney's office, Attorney General, and Civil process clerk attached to Proof of Service of Summons and complaint in accordance with FRCiv.P. 4(i)(1). (yl)
|
|
Filing 13
APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant United States filed by Plaintiff Jose Madrigal. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Thomas J. Conroy) (Conroy, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: First REQUEST for Default Judgment against Defendant United States #11 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: No Entry of Default on file. (yl)
|
|
Filing 11
First REQUEST for Default Judgment against Defendant United States filed by Plaintiff Jose Madrigal. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Thomas J. Conroy) (Conroy, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Jose Madrigal. (Conroy, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff /s to show cause in writing no later than September 20, 2019, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and sanctions imposed on counsel. (See minutes for further details) (yl)
|
|
Filing 8
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Madrigal, upon Defendant United States served on 7/10/2019, answer due 9/9/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by unspecified means. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Conroy, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 6
60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jose Madrigal, identifying Jose Madrigal. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Conroy, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jose Madrigal. (Conroy, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23894249 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jose Madrigal. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Thomas J. Conroy) (Attorney Thomas J Conroy added to party Jose Madrigal(pty:pla))(Conroy, Thomas)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
