Lewis Gibson v. Warden
| Lewis Gibson |
| Warden |
| 2:2019cv05101 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Steve Kim |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause #5 filed by Petitioner Lewis Gibson (hr) |
Filing 7
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim: granting #6 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File: Plaintiff's request is GRANTED. Plaintiff's response is now due on or before October 31, 2019. Failure to comply with this Court's July 3, 2019 Order to Show Cause may result in a recommendation to dismiss this action for failure to prosecute and to obey Court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); L.R. 41-1. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jm)
|
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Extension of Time filed by Petitioner Lewis Gibson. (hr) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before August 2, 2019 why the Court should not dismiss this 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. (See Minute Order for further details) (Attachments: #1 CV-09 Notice of Dismissal Form) (vm)
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: FILING OF PETITION WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEE OR DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. On or before July 15, 2019 Petitioner is to pay the filing fee or submit a Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 CV-69 Declaration Form) (hr)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111) (jtil) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of 28 USC 2241 Petition filed by Petitioner Lewis Gibson. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241), filed by Petitioner Lewis Gibson. Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis Gibson v. Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Lewis Gibson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden | |
| Represented By: | Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
