Ernest Miller v. Jim McDowell et al
| Ernest Miller and Ernest G. Logan |
| Mr. Sanchez, Jim McDowell, Mr. Tremble, Mr. Zavala and Mr. Rivas |
| 2:2019cv05113 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Charles F Eick |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: denying #2 Notice of Filing Complaint Without Prepayment of Filing Fees or REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (CV-93). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the plaintiff SHALL PAY THE FILING FEES IN FULL within 30 days or this case will be dismissed. (mrgo)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Re NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) #2 . Proposed Order forwarded to District Judge Anderson for approval.(sp) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93). (ghap) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Jim McDowell, Rivas, Sanchez, Tremble, Zavala pursuant to Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick., filed by plaintiff Ernest Miller. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
