Neway Mengistu v. Forestview Apartments, LLC et al
| Neway Mengistu |
| Forestview Apartments, LLC and Albert Navi |
| 2:2019cv05118 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. § 405 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 1 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Case ordered to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for Settlement Conference. (lc)
|
|
Filing 21
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (JURY TRIALS) by Judge Otis D Wright II: THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS VACATED. SEE THE LAST PAGE OF THIS ORDER FOR THE SPECIFIED DATES; Jury Trial: 11/10/20 9:00 AM; File final trial exhibit stipulation: 11/5/20; Hearing on Motions in limine: 11/2/20 1:30 PM; Final Pretrial Conference: 10/5/20 1:30 PM; File Motions in Limine: 10/5/20 ; File oppositions to motions in limine: 10/19/20 ; File Proposed Pretrial Conference Order, Memoranda and Contentions of Fact and Law, Joint Witness List, Joint Exhibit List and Exhibit Stipulation, Proposed Verdict Form(s), Proposed Jury Instructions / Disputed Jury Instructions, Proposed Voir Dire Questions, Joint Statement of the Case, Joint Status Report re: Settlement: 9/28/20; Deadline for hearing motions: 8/24/20;Deadline to Conduct Settlement Conference: 8/20/20; Expert discovery cutoff: 7/27/20; Percipient/Fact discovery cutoff: 7/13/20; deadline to amend: 3/30/20. (lc)
|
|
Filing 20
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 6 days per plaintiff, filed by Defendants Forestview Apartments, LLC, Albert Navi.. (Abraham, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 19
RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE #17 filed by Plaintiff Neway Mengistu (lc)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Forestview Apartments, LLC, Albert Navi Statement #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: file a joint report at least 7 days before the date of the Scheduling Conference.However, Plaintiff has not timely filed a joint report. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by January 6, 2020, why: 1) it has not complied with the CourtsOrder, or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and 2) the Court should not sanction Plaintiff. The Court VACATES the Scheduling Conference, and ORDERS the parties to meet and confer, and file a joint report on or before January 10, 2020. To the extent a Scheduling Conference is necessary, the Court will set one upon receipt of the parties joint report. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal or further sanctions without further notice. (lc)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Stephen E. Abraham in place of attorney Martin H. Orlick for Defendant Forestview Apartments, LLC and and Abert Navi #14 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) Modified on 1/2/2020 (lc).
|
|
Filing 15
STATEMENT Defendants' Rule 26 Report filed by Defendants Forestview Apartments, LLC, Albert Navi re: Order,, Set/Reset Hearing, #13 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Abraham, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 14
REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Stephen E. Abraham in place of attorney Martin H. Orlick NO HEARING SET filed by Defendant Forestview Apartments, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Request for Approval of Substitution or Withdrawal of Counsel) (Attorney Stephen E Abraham added to party Forestview Apartments, LLC(pty:dft)) (Abraham, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 1/6/2020 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 12
Corporate Disclosure Statement of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Forestview Apartments, LLC, Albert Navi, identifying Forestview Apartments, LLC; Albert Navi. (Orlick, Martin)
|
|
Filing 11
ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Defendants Forestview Apartments, LLC, Albert Navi.(Attorney Martin H Orlick added to party Forestview Apartments, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Martin H Orlick added to party Albert Navi(pty:dft))(Orlick, Martin)
|
|
Filing 10
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
|
Filing 8
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Neway Mengistu, upon Defendant Albert Navi, individual served on 9/9/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Alfred Navi, Manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address ; due diligience and by also mailing a copy. (lc)
|
|
Filing 7
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Neway Mengistu, upon Defendant Forestview Apartments, LLC served on 9/9/2019, answer due 9/30/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Alfred Navi, registered agent by leaving with Alfred Navi, manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service and by also mailing a copy. (lc)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Neway Mengistu. (et)
|
|
Filing 3
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Albert Navi. (et)
|
|
Filing 2
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Forestview Apartments, LLC. (et)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Defendants Forestview Apartments, LLC, Albert Navi. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (Filing fee $ 400 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Neway Mengistu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
