Michael Deuschel v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan et al
| Michael Deuschel |
| Judge Joseph DeVanon, Judge David Horowitz, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, JAMS, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, The Law Office of Marcella A. Bell, Kevin Kalberg, Alternative Resolution Centers, Office of the Independent Administrator, Judge Terry Friedman, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv05214 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES AND CLOSING CASE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips Denying #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis: Plaintiff has failed to submit a timely response. Accordingly, the Request to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees is DENIED and the case is closed. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (bm)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval. Re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #2 . (vm) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Plaintiffs response is due September 20, 2019. granting #8 REQUEST for Extension (vm)
|
| Filing 11 REQUEST TO STAY ALL MATTERS DUE TO MEDICAL INCAPACITATION UNTIL FULLY RECOVERED FROM SCHEDULED BRAIN SURGERY filed by plaintiff Michael Deuschel. (bm) |
| Filing 9 ADDENDUM TO REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DUE TO MEDICAL INCAPACITATION #8 filed by Plaintiff Michael Deuschel. (bm) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DUE TO MEDICAL INCAPACITATION filed by plaintiff Michael Deuschel. (bm) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Plaintiffs response to this order (not to exceed 10 pages) will be due byJuly 5. The Court will defer making a recommendation to the assigned district judge regarding the IFP application or assessing fees until it reviews Plaintiffs submission. (See Minute Order for further details) (vm)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Michael Deuschel. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Michael Deuschel. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Alternative Resolution Centers, Joseph DeVanon, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Terry Friedman, David Horowitz, JAMS, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Kevin Kalberg, Office of the Independent Administrator, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, The Law Office of Marcella A. Bell.Case assigned to Judge Virginia A. Phillips for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R Wilner. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Michael Deuschel. (Attachments: #1 CV-71, #2 Summons) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
