Charles Damm, III v. Kelly Santoro
Petitioner: Charles Damm, III
Respondent: Kelly Santoro
Case Number: 2:2019cv05246
Filed: June 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Ronald SW Lew
Referring Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2019 Filing 13 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 filing fee from Charles Damm. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number LA193059. (ek)
August 5, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Respondent Kelly Santoro, Warden re Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #11 (Attachments: #1 LD 1 CT 1 of 1 prob rpt omitted, #2 LD 2 RT 1 of 3, #3 LD 2 RT 2 of 3, #4 LD 2 RT 3 of 3, #5 LD 3 AOB (B276552), #6 LD 4 RB (B276552), #7 LD 5 ARB (B276552), #8 LD 6 Supplemental AOB (B276552), #9 LD 7 Order Granting Leave to File supplemental AOB, #10 LD 8 Supplemental RB (B276552), #11 LD 9 Supplemental ARB (B276552), #12 LD 10 DCA Opinion (B276552), #13 LD 11 Pet for Review (S247388), #14 LD 12 Order denying Pet for Review (S247388), #15 LD 13 BA441353 Min. Ord. 6.11.18, #16 LD 14 CSC habeas petition S256250 (signed 6-5-19))(Brenan, Stephanie)
August 5, 2019 Filing 11 OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR RHINES STAY; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES re: REQUEST to hold case in abeyance pending Exhausting State Claims #2 filed by Respondent Kelly Santoro. (Brenan, Stephanie)
July 29, 2019 Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Charles Damm, III. (rn)
July 29, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION to AMEND Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 filed by Petitioner Charles Damm, III. (hr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/30/2019: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3) (hr).
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting #7 APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is granted until August 9, 2019, to file a Response to Petitioner's Request for Stay and Abeyance under Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). (hr)
July 23, 2019 Filing 7 First APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE; DECLARATION OF STEPHANIE C. BRENAN; [PROPOSED] ORDER filed by Respondent Kelly Santoro. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Brenan, Stephanie)
July 2, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Supervising Deputy Attorney General Stephanie C. Brenan on behalf of Respondent Kelly Santoro. (Attorney Stephanie C Brenan added to party Kelly Santoro(pty:res))(Brenan, Stephanie)
June 26, 2019 Filing 5 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS): BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re: Request for a Stay in Abeyance While Exhausting State Claims #2 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent shall file a response on or before July 26, 2019. 2. Petitioner may file a reply within 14 days of service of the response. 3. Unless otherwise ordered, the court will take the motion under submission without oral argument as of the date the reply is due. (hr)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING A RESPONSE/ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Answer shall be filed by 9/9/2019. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 8/26/2019. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (See Order for Further Details) (Attachments: #1 Petition) (kl)
June 14, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111 Notice Re Discrepancies in Filing of Habeas Corpus Petition) (car)
June 14, 2019 Filing 2 Petitioner's request for a stay in abeyance pending exhausting State claims filed by Charles Damm, III. (car)
June 14, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg.(Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Charles Damm, III. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charles Damm, III v. Kelly Santoro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kelly Santoro
Represented By: Stephanie C Brenan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Damm, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?