Chris Langer v. Steve Young Kim et al
| Chris Langer |
| Does 1-10, Steve Young Kim, Jin Deok Kim, David S. Chin, Sarah & Brother, Inc and Sarah and Brother, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv05252 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: granting #14 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to All Defendants. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 11/4/2019. (jp)
|
|
Filing 19
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE DEFENDANTS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR STAY AND EARLY MEDIATION (DKT. 14) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Application #14 is GRANTED. This action is stayed until 11/4/2019 so that the early mediation process can be completed. A separate order will issue that refers the parties to the ADR Program. Counsel are ordered to comply with all the requirements of that order. If a settlement is reached, counsel shall file a notice of settlement by 11/8/2019, which shall include a date by which a dismissal will be filed. If a settlement is not reached, counsel shall file a Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report by 11/8/2019, which shall include a statement as to the procedural status of the parties' settlement efforts, whether discussions are ongoing and whether a further session with the panel mediator is anticipated and, if so, when such is expected to occur. Upon review of the Joint Report, the Court will issue a scheduling order. (jp)
|
| Filing 18 OPPOSITION re: First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #14 filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Chris Langer(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER Re Stipulation Extending Defendants' Time to Respond to Plaintiff's initial Complaint By More Than 30 Days (DKT. #16 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt that (1) Defendants Steve Young Kim and Jin Deok Kim, individuals and as Trustee of the KIM FAMILY TRUST, dated 2/23/2004, will have a thirty (30) day extension of time, up to and including 8/16/2019, to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Initial complaint in the above-captioned action. (2) David S. Chin, will have a thirty five (35) day extension of time, up to and including 8/16/2019, to file an Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Initial complaint in the above-captioned action. (3) Sarah and Brother, Inc., will have a twenty (20) day extension of time, up to and including 8/16/2019, to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Initial complaint in the above-captioned action. (jp)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File David S. Chin, Jin Deok Kim(in individual), Steve Young Kim(representative capacity as trustee of the Kim Family Trust Dated February 23, 2004), Sarah and Brother, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Kenneth T Haan added to party Jin Deok Kim(pty:dft), Attorney Kenneth T Haan added to party Steve Young Kim(pty:dft))(Haan, Kenneth) |
| Filing 14 First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by defendants David S. Chin, Jin Deok Kim(epresentative capacity as trustee of the Kim Family Trust Dated February 23, 2004), Steve Young Kim(in individual ), Sarah and Brother, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Signed Application JDKIM, #2 Signed Application CHIN, #3 Signed Application Sarag&Brother) (Attorney Kenneth T Haan added to party David S. Chin(pty:dft), Attorney Kenneth T Haan added to party Jin Deok Kim(pty:dft), Attorney Kenneth T Haan added to party Steve Young Kim(pty:dft), Attorney Kenneth T Haan added to party Sarah and Brother, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Haan, Kenneth) |
|
Filing 15
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Courts Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. (shb)
|
| Filing 13 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant David S. Chin filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service) (Grace, Phyl) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Sarah and Brother, Inc. served on 7/5/2019, answer due 7/26/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Juan Herrera - receptionist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Steve Young Kim(representative capacity as trustee of the Kim Family Trust Dated February 23, 2004) served on 6/26/2019, answer due 7/17/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Steve Young Kim, in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Jin Deok Kim(in individual) served on 6/26/2019, answer due 7/17/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jin Deok Kim in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-05252 JAK(JPRx). (rn)
|
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant David S. Chin served on 6/20/2019, answer due 7/11/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants David S. Chin, Jin Deok Kim(in individual), Jin Deok Kim(epresentative capacity as trustee of the Kim Family Trust Dated February 23, 2004), Steve Young Kim(representative capacity as trustee of the Kim Family Trust Dated February 23, 2004), Steve Young Kim(in individual ), Sarah and Brother, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23927969 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Chris Langer(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
