Wixen Music Publishing, Inc. v. Pandora Media, Inc. et al
| Wixen Music Publishing, Inc. |
| Pandora Media, LLC, Pandora Media, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2019cv05278 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 9/9/2019 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Pandora Media, Inc., Pandora Media, LLC, (Freundlich, Kenneth) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Pandora Media, Inc., Pandora Media, LLC.(Freundlich, Kenneth) |
| Filing 14 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Pandora Media, LLC answer now due 7/30/2019; Pandora Media, Inc. answer now due 7/30/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Pandora Media, LLC; Pandora Media, Inc..(Attorney Kenneth D Freundlich added to party Pandora Media, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Kenneth D Freundlich added to party Pandora Media, LLC(pty:dft))(Freundlich, Kenneth) |
| Filing 13 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Wixen Music Publishing, Inc., upon Defendant Pandora Media, LLC served on 6/25/2019, answer due 7/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Steinberg, David) |
| Filing 12 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Wixen Music Publishing, Inc., upon Defendant Pandora Media, Inc. served on 6/25/2019, answer due 7/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Steinberg, David) |
|
Filing 11
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Pandora Media, LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Pandora Media, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Wixen Music Publishing, Inc.. (Steinberg, David) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Wixen Music Publishing, Inc., identifying Wixen Music Publishing, Inc.; Pandora Media, Inc.; Pandora Media, LLC. (Steinberg, David) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Wixen Music Publishing, Inc.. (Steinberg, David) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Wixen Music Publishing, Inc.. (Steinberg, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Wixen Music Publishing, Inc.. (Steinberg, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23933253 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Wixen Music Publishing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Schedule A to Complaint) (Attorney David A Steinberg added to party Wixen Music Publishing, Inc.(pty:pla))(Steinberg, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
